The Relationship Between Burnout, Interpersonal Commitment, Client Adherence, and Quality of Work Life Among Neurofeedback Practitioners

Authors

  • Jonathon Larson
  • Thomas Cothran
  • Lauren Drandorff
  • Charles Morgan
  • Catherine Ryan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/10874208.2012.728103

Abstract

This study identified neurofeedback (NFB) practitioner self-perceptions related to quality of work life. We also identified practitioner  self-perceptions of common clinician factors related to NFB. To guide this current study, we utilized our previous conceptual framework research
on practitioner perspectives of NFB (Larson, Ryan, & Baerentzen, 2010). One hundred forty-eight NFB practitioners completed online surveys gathering demographic information and ratings of practice behaviors and characteristics. For data set analyses, we utilized descriptive statistics, frequencies, means, standard deviations, ranges, Cronbach’s alpha
analysis, Pearson product–moment correlation analysis, and a regular simultaneous regression analysis. Our results indicated that 74% of the variance in quality of work life can be determined by variance in a significant multiple correlation of burnout, interpersonal skills commitment, and client adherence. We found monthly sessions correlated with financial gain or loss (FGL). We also found client adherence separately correlated with monthly sessions, NFB knowledge, NFB learning commitment, and NFB mentorship. For NFB practitioner
self-perceptions of common clinician factors, the most frequently endorsed practitioner traits in rank order were (a) ethical, (b) attentive, (c) empathic, (d) calm, (d) observant, (e) sense of humor, (f) analytical and confident (tied), (g) friendly and realistic expectations (tied), (h) optimistic, and (i) careful. NFB practitioner quality of work life appeared to be related to three straightforward components: reducing burnout, increasing commitment to enhancing interpersonal skills, and increasing client adherence. Practitioners providing mentoring, practitioners improving NFB knowledge and skills, and more monthly sessions are separately related to client adherence. Of interest, we found only the number of monthly sessions positively correlated with monthly FGL. We found a variety of perceived NFB common clinician factors adding to the complexity of understanding factors influencing NFB outcomes. Of interest, two (attentive and calm) of the top four practitioner
self-perceptions of common clinician factors are also important NFB client outcomes.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-25

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 4 (2012)

Section

SCIENTIFIC FEATURES

License

© International Society for Neurofeedback and Research (ISNR), all rights reserved. This article (the “Article”) may be accessed online from ISNR at no charge. The Article may be viewed online, stored in electronic or physical form, or archived for research, teaching, and private study purposes. The Article may be archived in public libraries or university libraries at the direction of said public library or university library. Any other reproduction of the Article for redistribution, sale, resale, loan, sublicensing, systematic supply, or other distribution, including both physical and electronic reproduction for such purposes, is expressly forbidden. Preparing or reproducing derivative works of this article is expressly forbidden. ISNR makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any content in the Article.  From 1995 to 2013 the Journal of Neurotherapy was the official publication of ISNR (www. Isnr.org); on April 27, 2016 ISNR acquired the journal from Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. In 2014, ISNR established its official open-access journal NeuroRegulation (ISSN: 2373-0587; www.neuroregulation.org).